Volume 20, Issue 2 (7-2021)                   TB 2021, 20(2): 12-26 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: ۵۶۱۴۳
Ethics code: IR.IAU.SEMNAN.REC.1398.024


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kaskaldareh M, Najafi L, Zaboli R, Roshdi I. Explaining the Barriers and Deficiencies of a Family Physician Program Based on Electronic Health Record: A Qualitative Research. TB 2021; 20 (2) :12-26
URL: http://tbj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-3148-en.html
Islamic Azad University of semnan , lnajafikia@gmail.com
Full-Text [PDF 626 kb]   (805 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1341 Views)
Full-Text:   (1853 Views)
Explaining the Barriers and Deficiencies of a Family Physician Program Based on Electronic Health Record: A Qualitative Research
 
Maryam Kaskaldareh(Ph.D.)1, Leila Najafi(Ph.D.)2, Rouhollah Zaboli(Ph.D.)3, Israfil Roshdi(Ph.D.)4
1.Ph.D. candidate of Health Care Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University , Semnan, Iran.
2. Corresponding author: Assistant professor, Department of Health Care Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran. Email: lnajafikia@gmail.com   Tel: 09125505380                  
 3. Associate Professor, Department of Health Care Managment, Faculty of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4.Assistant professor, Department of Basic Sciences, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.
 
Abstract
 
Introduction: Electronic health record is electronic data of “entire life of a person” registered by healthcare providers and shared in different health centers. The electronic health record has been announced to all medical universities of the country since March 2016 by launching the Integrated Health System (SIB). This study explains the barriers and shortcomings of the family physician program based on electronic health records in Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 
Methods: this qualitative content analysis study  with a  purposefull sampling  was conducted until data saturation time; Experiences and viewpoint of 15 assistants of health networks, Authorities of Health networks development, family physicians and expert of information security of University were collected through individual interview and notes in 2019-2020. Data were entered into MAXQDA software and the process of analysis (repeated reading and coding) was performed.
Results: Findings were extracted in the form of five main categories including constraints: Structure and manpower, insufficient skills of planners and service providers, internal and external coordination, web-based system and related equipment, budgets with several subcategories.
Conclusion: In order to improve the quality of the implementation of the family physician program, which aims to provide health care to the covered population, the use of electronic health records can be institutionalized with the objectives of the family physician program by eliminating the identified shortcomings.
 
Keywords: Barriers, Family physician, Electronic health record, SIB
Reference
1-Patient protection solutions in the electronic file system. Medicine and medicine. 2002; 17             (72-73): 48-56.[Persian]
2-Orlova AO, Dunnagan  M, Finitzo T, Higgins M, Watkins T, Tien A, et al. An electronic health record-public health (EHR-PH) system prototype for interoperability in 21st century healthcare systems. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association.2005;2005(7):575-9.
3-Safdari R, Masoori N, Seied Farajollah SS. A comparative study on the functions of pioneer organizations (ASTM, HL7 and ISO) in developing electronic health record. 2011;8(3):422-432. [Persian]
4-Rezae P, Ahmadi M, Sadughi F. Comparative study on EHR content, structure, and terminology standards in selected organizations and design a model for Iran. Journal of Health Administration. 2007;10(29):55-64.[Persian]
5-Ahmadian L, Khajouei R, SalehiNejad S, Ebrahimzadeh M, Nikkar SE. Prioritizing barriers to successful implementation of hospital information systems. Journal of medical systems. 2014;38(12):151.[Persian]
6- Jafari H, Ranjbar M, Amini Rarani M, Hashemi FS, Bidoki SS. Experiences and Views of Users about Delivering Services through the Integrated Health System: A qualitative study. Tolooebehdasht. 2020;19(2):57-71.[Persian]
7-Mirani N, Ayatollahi H, Haghani H. A survey on barriers to the development and adoption of electronic health records in Iran. Journal of Health Administration (JHA). 2013;15(50).65-75. [Persian]
8-Jebraeily M, Piri Z, Rahimi B, Ghasemzade N, Ghasemirad M, Mahmodi A. Barriers of electronic health records implementation. Director General. 2012;8(6):807-14. [Persian]
9-Kruse CS, Stein A, Thomas H, Kaur H. The use of electronic health records to support population health: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of medical systems. 2018;42(11):214.
10-Asadnia A, Jalilpour P. A feasible study on the privatization of public libraries: a SWOT analysis approach. 2013;19(2):213-33.[Persian]
11-Brender J. Handbook of evaluation methods for health informatics: Elsevier Academic Press Burlington.2011;17(4):276-7.
12-Nasiripour A, Radfar R, Najaf Beygi R, Rahmani H. Evaluating the Effective Factors on Establishing an Electronic Health System in Iran.Journal of Hospital.2011; 10(1): 53-62.[Persian]
13- Department of Health, Health Insurance Organization of Iran. guidline of the Familiy physician and rural insurance program.Tehran: Ministry of Health and Treatment.2020;1-66.[Persian]
14-Kabir MJ, Jafari N, Nahimi Tabihi M, et al. Health record and provided services recording among centers implementing rural family physician and insurance program in Northern provinces of Iran. Journal of Hospital. 2015;14(2):61-9.[Persian]
15-McGovern M, Quinlan M, Doyle G, Moore G, Geiger S. Implementing a national electronic referral program: qualitative study. JMIR medical informatics. 2018;6(3):e10488.
16-Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health affairs. 2004;23(2):116-26.
17-Jebraeily M, Ahmadi M, Hajavi A, Gohari M, Sedghi Jahromi M, Zareh Z. Electronic health records: personnel readiness assessment. Journal of Health Administration. 2010;13(39):17-24. [Persian]
18-Meade B, Buckley D, Boland M. What factors affect the use of electronic patient records by Irish GPs? International journal of medical informatics.2009;78(8):551-8.
19-Jha AK, Bates DW, Jenter C, et al. Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2009;15(1):158-63.
20-Crowley K, Mishra A, Cruz-Cano R, et al. Electronic health record implementation findings at a large, suburban health and human services department. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2019;25(1):6-11.
21-Rathert C, Porter TH, Mittler JN, Fleig-Palmer M. Seven years after Meaningful Use: Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences with electronic health records. Health care management review. 2019;44(1):30-40.
22-Young R, Burge S, Kumar K, Wilson J, Ortiz D. A time-motion study of primary care physicians’ work in the electronic health record era. Family medicine. 2018;50(2):91-9.
23-Najafi L, Faraji A, editors. Satisfaction survey service providers and recipients of health care insurance program for rural and city families Tuyserkan. Seminar of Hamandishi. 2008;126.[Persian]
24-Castillo VH, Martinez-Garcia AI, Pulido J. A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2010;10(1):60.
25-Holden RJ. What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements? A study of facilitators and barriers to physicians use of electronic health records. Journal of patient safety. 2011;7(4):193.
26-Bonacina S, Marceglia S, Pinciroli F. Barriers against adoption of electronic health record in Italy. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2011;2(4):509-26.
 
 
 
 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/12/8 | Accepted: 2021/01/30 | Published: 2021/07/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Tolooebehdasht

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb