Volume 19, Issue 3 (8-2020)                   TB 2020, 19(3): 62-72 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abrisham S M, Shafiee M, Abedini saniji M. Evaluation of Hearing Status in Employees of Dental Prosthodontics Laboratories in Yazd. TB 2020; 19 (3) :62-72
URL: http://tbj.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-2946-en.html
, mohsenabediny@gmail.com
Full-Text [PDF 597 kb]   (826 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1395 Views)
Full-Text:   (758 Views)
Evaluation of Hearing Status in Employees of Dental Prosthodontics Laboratories in Yazd
 
Seyed Mohammad Abrisham(M.D.)1, Mohammad Shafiee(M.D.)2, Mohsen Abediny Sanich(M.D.)3
1.Assistant Professor, Department  of Prosthesis, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran.
2.General Practitioner,School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran.
3.Corresponding Author:Dentist, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran.                                                                                        Email: mohsenabediny@gmail.com                 Tel:09103096088
 
Abstract
 
Introduction: Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) is the first cause of acquired hearing loss. Dentists and dental prosthodontics technicians are exposed to different sounds produced by a variety of devices in their occupations. In this study, we studied the effect of dental prosthesis sounds on the auditory power of the respective staff.
Methods: This case-control study was carried out among all technicians of dental prosthesis laboratories in Yazd in 2018 selected by census sampling method. A total of 23 technicians who were willing to cooperate and met the inclusion criteria were included in the experimental group. Furthermore,  23 people who referred to the audiology clinic, were matched with the experimental group in terms of age and gender, and were not working in noisy environment, and had no congenital or acquired deafness were examined as the control group.  Finally, the collected data were analyzed by SPSS version 19 using statistical tests.
Results: The mean hearing threshold of the right ear at frequencies of 3000 and 4000 Hz and the mean hearing threshold of the left ear at frequencies of 3000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz was significantly higher in the experimental than the control group. The mean hearing threshold of the right ear at the frequency of 4000 Hz and the hearing threshold of the left ear at frequencies of 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz in participants with job history>4 years was significantly higher. Furthermore, the mean hearing threshold of the right ear in the frequency of 4000 Hz and the hearing threshold of the left ear at frequencies of 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz years was significantly higher in people with job history >30 years.
Conclusion: According to findings, the staffs working in dental prosthodontics laboratories suffer from NIHL at frequencies of 3000 to 8000 Hz. The hearing loss in the left ear was more severe  in  people with job history of >30 years and in people with job history of > 4 years.Therefore, the use of hearing impaired and hearing protectors is recommended in these people.
 
Keywords: Audiometry, Laboratory, Dental prosthodontic, Hearing status
Conflict of interest: The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
References
1-Khavanin A, Soleimani M, Akbari M, Mirzaaie R, Nazari S, Motalebi M. Effect of different exposure times to compliance noise on rabbits’ hearing protection by distortion product oto acoustic emissions. Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences.2013;17(1):18-25.[Persian]
2-Kardan Yamchi  H, Valipour F, Pourtaghi  G, Dehghan H, Salem M, Jamali Z. Survey of dentistry noise exposure in different parts of the great centers of Dentistry, Tehran. Health System Research.2015;11(3):564-572.[Persian]
3-Parmeggiani L. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety: LZ:3ed International labour office.1983.
4-Rebecca M. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Dental Offices. Medical Journal. 2008;2(22):1-7.
5-Americo E, Medina J, Butignolli S, Martins J. Can noise in dental clinic produce hearing loss? Intl. Arch Otorhinolaryngol.2011;5:80-4.
6-Unlu  A, Boke  B, Belgin  E, Sarmadi  H. Effect of Equipment Used in Laboratory Environment on Dental Technicians  Hearing Threshold. J Islamic Acad Sci.1994;7:237-40.
7-Moussavi-Najarkola SA, Khavanin A, Mirzaee R, Salehnia M, Akbari M, Asilian H, Soleimanian A. Study of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions. JBUMS. 2011;13(5):34-43.[Persian]
8-Garner  G, Federman  J, Johnson  A. Noise induced hearing loss in the dental environment: An audiologist’s perspective. J Georgia Dent Assoc.2002;15:9-17.
9-Hyson JM. The air turbine and hearing loss: are dentists at risk? The Journal of the American Dental Association.2002;133(12):1639-42.
10-Fazli  M, Nassiri  P, Hasani  Z. Noise induced hearing loss in Zanjan dentists. ZUMS Journal. 2009;17(68):65-74.
11-Ehsani M, Monadi M, Ranjbar S, Bijani A, GHasemi N. Hearing threshold evaluation of dentists in Babol (North of Iran).caspian journal of dental research. 2014;3: 14-20.
12-Ebrahim zade M, Darvishi E. The Study of hearing status and its influencing factors in the workers of mines in the central region. Zanko J Med Sci. 2015; 16 (48) :33-41. [Persian]
13-Halvani GH, Barkhordari A, Askarshahi M. Noise-induced Hearing loss among rail road workers in Yazd. Journal Of Ilam University Of Medical Sciences. 2005; 13(2): 56-62. [Persian]
14-Altinoz HC, Gokbudak R, Bayraktar A, Belli S. A pilot study of measurement of the frequency of sounds emitted by high-speed dental air turbines. Journal of oral science.2001;43(3):189-92.
15-Bali N, Acharya S, Anup N. An assessment of the effect of sound produced in a dental clinic on the hearing of dentists. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry.2007;5(3):187.
16-Khanehmasjedi M, Ardekani Z, Falahiezadeh S, Alipour V, Rezaei L, Basir L. Noise exposure and hearing threshold evaluation of faculty members in the School of Dentistry, Ahwaz University of Medical Sciences in1394. Jpm.2016; 3(3):14-20.[Persian]
17-Alabdulwahhab BM, Alduraiby RI, Ahmed MA, Albatli LI, Alhumain MS, Softah NA, et al. Hearing loss and its association with occupational noise exposure among Saudi dentists: a cross-sectional study. BDJ Open.2016;2:160.
18-Joshi  R, Shah  S, Rijal  A, Dhungana  A, Maharjan S. An evaluation of hearing among the dental professionals of Nmcth. Nepal Med Coll J.2017;18(1):17-20.
19-Ahmed HO, Ali WJ. Noise levels, noise annoyance, and hearing-related problems in a dental college. Archives of environmental & occupational health. 2017;72(3):159-65.
20-Ali RT, Fatah NA, Hasan FF. Noise induced hearing loss in textil factory and dental labrotory. AL-Qadisiyah Medical Journal.2017;7(11):143-59.
21-Khaimook W, Suksamae P, Choosong T, Chayarpham S, Tantisarasart R. The prevalence of noise-induced occupational hearing loss in dentistry personnel. Workplace health & safety. 2014;62(9):357-60.





 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/08/5 | Accepted: 2019/09/8 | Published: 2020/08/31

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Tolooebehdasht

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb